The Uticans for 9/11 Truth are proud to announce their endorsement of Les Paul for President in 2008. We realize there may be some concern over the age issue, and we understand that he has not previously held high public office, but Les Paul is one of the great innovative minds of the past century and he offers the insight and imagination that this country needs. Les Paul invented multi-track recording and the classic solid-body guitar that bears his name. The leader of the free world needs no further recommendation than this.
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
UTICANS ENDORSE PAUL FOR PRESIDENT!
The Uticans for 9/11 Truth are proud to announce their endorsement of Les Paul for President in 2008. We realize there may be some concern over the age issue, and we understand that he has not previously held high public office, but Les Paul is one of the great innovative minds of the past century and he offers the insight and imagination that this country needs. Les Paul invented multi-track recording and the classic solid-body guitar that bears his name. The leader of the free world needs no further recommendation than this.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
NICO HAUPT'S NEW MASH-UP: "JESUS DID 9/11 (YELLOW MAGIC COLUMBO CHINALATINO GOLDMAN SACHS MIX)"
This is solid, creative stuff--Nico's refreshing (some would say "bracing") approach to this material is worth a close look. This is no time to allow the usual gatekeepers to determine where the velvet ropes of orthodoxy should be placed. Read more about this video series HERE. This is a loud video, so adjust your computer speakers accordingly. Also, watching it in full screen mode (and repeated viewing) will reveal many essential details.
Wednesday, December 19, 2007
FOOL ME ONCE . . .
Monday, December 17, 2007
BLIMPS? ASSASSINATION PLOTS? RON PAUL IS SOMEBODY!
According to Daniel Estulin, the Elites are planning to whack Ron Paul. That's it, boys and girls--he's made the Big Time. Within weeks he should start seeing the Black Panthers on his front lawn.
Also, it seems to me that journalist Estulin
bears an uncanny resemblance to 1920s jazz cornet legend Bix Beiderbecke.
And here's more footage of that cool blimp:
I just can't get enough of this stuff!
Also, it seems to me that journalist Estulin
bears an uncanny resemblance to 1920s jazz cornet legend Bix Beiderbecke.
And here's more footage of that cool blimp:I just can't get enough of this stuff!
Tuesday, December 11, 2007
ISN'T ALEX JONES THE "RON PAUL BLIMP?"
UPDATE: HERE is the Official Theme Song for the Ron Paul Blimp.
Saturday, December 08, 2007
OMAHA MALL SHOOTINGS: POLICE AND REPORTING COMEDY OF (T)ERRORS
Field reporter (and honorary Utican) Dwight Ward took L.A. Times reporters Nicholas Riccardi and DeeDee Correll to task for their slovenly work. Do we smell a conspiracy? Naaah. Just the news biz as usual. As Dwight said,
It's early days with this yet but I should say that I'm leaning more towards this not being an engineered event. Both the police work and reporting were careless and incompetent, as was the entire system of juvenile care for Robert in the last decade.
Here's the exchange (used with permission) between Dwight and the L.A. Times:
To: nicholas.riccardi@latimes.com; deedee.correll@latimes.com
Sent: Fri Dec 07 06:58:30 2007
Subject: Omaha mall shooting
Mr. Riccardi and Ms. Correll,
My comments and questions refer to your article of December 7, 2007.
Mall victims were just ordinary folks
The suicidal killer, Robert Hawkins, stole his stepfather's rifle. The killing was over before police could arrive on the scene.
By Nicholas Riccardi and DeeDee Correll, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers December 7, 2007
In this article you state: "They and five others were killed Wednesday by a suicidal 19-year-old who sprayed the Von Maur department store with about 30 rounds from an AK-47 rifle he had stolen from his stepfather."
Your reporting is now consistent with other major news outlets, but this was not the case earlier on. Previous stories have Omaha police chief Thomas Warren stating confidently that authorities recovered an SKS assault rifle at the scene (see attached). No one reports that Hawkins carried multiple rifles.
Setting aside the issue that Warren mistakenly refers to the SKS carbine as an assault rifle, it seems highly unlikely that experienced police officers would mistake one type of firearm for the other, as any American adolescent boy knows what an AK-47 looks like, and, while the SKS is more obscure, it has no similarities to an AK-47. It is equally unlikely that the description of one could morph into the other as it passed from person to person. Both versions are too highly specific for any explanation of simple error to suffice.
I will just flatly state that it appears to me that this story is being 'managed' at the expense of the facts, for reasons unknown. Is this major discrepancy a concern to you on any level?
Thanks,
Dwight Ward
- - - - -
Subject: Re: Omaha mall shooting
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:22:14 -0800
From: Riccardi, Nicholas
To: Dwight Ward
You've hit upon something odd, which is that the police have referred to this as both an ak-47 and an sks. There hasn't been time to pin them down and they refer to an ak more often, so everyone has gone with that.
One final comment from Ang Riedel (of Think or Be Eaten; also an honorary Utican) on this exchange:
They 'went with it'? That's journalism? Going with it instead of finding out for sure? Sheesh.
It's early days with this yet but I should say that I'm leaning more towards this not being an engineered event. Both the police work and reporting were careless and incompetent, as was the entire system of juvenile care for Robert in the last decade.
Here's the exchange (used with permission) between Dwight and the L.A. Times:
To: nicholas.riccardi@latimes.com; deedee.correll@latimes.com
Sent: Fri Dec 07 06:58:30 2007
Subject: Omaha mall shooting
Mr. Riccardi and Ms. Correll,
My comments and questions refer to your article of December 7, 2007.
Mall victims were just ordinary folks
The suicidal killer, Robert Hawkins, stole his stepfather's rifle. The killing was over before police could arrive on the scene.
By Nicholas Riccardi and DeeDee Correll, Los Angeles Times Staff Writers December 7, 2007
In this article you state: "They and five others were killed Wednesday by a suicidal 19-year-old who sprayed the Von Maur department store with about 30 rounds from an AK-47 rifle he had stolen from his stepfather."
Your reporting is now consistent with other major news outlets, but this was not the case earlier on. Previous stories have Omaha police chief Thomas Warren stating confidently that authorities recovered an SKS assault rifle at the scene (see attached). No one reports that Hawkins carried multiple rifles.
Setting aside the issue that Warren mistakenly refers to the SKS carbine as an assault rifle, it seems highly unlikely that experienced police officers would mistake one type of firearm for the other, as any American adolescent boy knows what an AK-47 looks like, and, while the SKS is more obscure, it has no similarities to an AK-47. It is equally unlikely that the description of one could morph into the other as it passed from person to person. Both versions are too highly specific for any explanation of simple error to suffice.
I will just flatly state that it appears to me that this story is being 'managed' at the expense of the facts, for reasons unknown. Is this major discrepancy a concern to you on any level?
Thanks,
Dwight Ward
- - - - -
Subject: Re: Omaha mall shooting
Date: Fri, 07 Dec 2007 07:22:14 -0800
From: Riccardi, Nicholas
To: Dwight Ward
You've hit upon something odd, which is that the police have referred to this as both an ak-47 and an sks. There hasn't been time to pin them down and they refer to an ak more often, so everyone has gone with that.
One final comment from Ang Riedel (of Think or Be Eaten; also an honorary Utican) on this exchange:
They 'went with it'? That's journalism? Going with it instead of finding out for sure? Sheesh.
Sunday, December 02, 2007
BUY OUR AUDIOS!!
Now that Vyzygoth has closed down "The Grassy Knoll" he has compiled several series of note into handy single volumes for your listening enjoyment. For some strange reason, he has similarly packaged the 17 shows that Herb and I did with him. If you simply can't get enough of our sparkling repartee, there's about 20 hours of it available.Also, Vyz will continue to post past Knoll episodes of special merit on the site.
UPDATE: On Dec. 3, Vyz appeared on Adam Gorightly's "Untamed Dimensions." That program may be downloaded HERE.
Vyz's Nov. 30 program with Gordon Comstock may be downloaded HERE.
Thursday, November 29, 2007
STEVE JONES--AX MAN AND GATE KEEPER?
Though he is considered a sainted figure by those in the Movement (particularly those who stand on street corners shouting "Thermite! Thermate!") it behooves us to remember that there are certain issues surrounding Professor Steven E. Jones that call his credibility into question. In June 2006 Fintan Dunne did a program on Jones concerning his role in shutting down Cold Fusion. HERE is a link to that topic, with links to the program (both DSL and Dial-up).
Wednesday, November 28, 2007
UTICANS PODCAST ON WBCR BERKSHIRE RADIO
I heard today from Frank Tolopko, host of 911 Report on WBCR-LP Berkshire Community Radio (97.7 FM, Great Barrington, MA). Frank is planning this week to broadcast highlights from The Last 911 Podcast You'll Ever Need, which I posted in August. 911 Report is broadcast (with an internet stream) at 7 PM ET on Thursday, with a rebroadcast at 6 PM ET Saturday.
Here is Frank's website.
Here is Frank's website.
Monday, November 26, 2007
THAT'S ALL FOLKS!!
Last Monday Herb Smith and I spoke with Vyzygoth for our final "From the Grassy Knoll" program, now available for download HERE. Vyz is shutting down the program, having found the answers to his main questions, and having said most of what he wanted to say in that context. We'll miss the Knoll, but we understand. When you find what you're looking for, and achieve what you set out to achieve, it's time to stop looking and striving, and go on to something else. To do otherwise is to dwell in GCN hell.Vyz is leaving at the very top of his game. No sharks were jumped or otherwise harmed in the taping of this program.
Saturday, November 17, 2007
Attack of the Flying Beer Cans
More disturbing evidence for TV fakery (The Theory That Dare Not Speak Its Name):
Monday, November 12, 2007
VIDEO: 911 PATTERN OF THE CRIME
Submitted by Dwight (thanks!) with this note:
If you have 23 minutes, check out this video. There's a lot of background I won't try to fill in and there's some disappointing weirdness in this group's research but I think there's some meat here.
If you have 23 minutes, check out this video. There's a lot of background I won't try to fill in and there's some disappointing weirdness in this group's research but I think there's some meat here.
Monday, November 05, 2007
9/11 BLIMP DAVE ON VYZYGOTH
Dave from 9/11 Blimp and 9/11 University recorded an excellent program with Vyzygoth for "The Grassy Knoll" which is now available for download HERE. Dave discusses factors involved in the destruction of the WTC that are seldom broached by "Movement" types, and does so with wit and clarity.
Tuesday, October 30, 2007
GEORGE CARLIN IS THE REAL DEAL!
Even at 70, George Carlin could kick Bill Maher's ass. (Thanks to Baz.)
Monday, October 29, 2007
GEO KARRAS: A PSALM FOR SATANICA
This is a tough video to watch, but well worth your time and attention.
Tuesday, October 23, 2007
CURRENT EVENTS "GARAGE SALE" ON VYZYGOTH!
This past Friday, Vyz and I recorded a "From the Grassy Knoll" program on current events which is now available for download HERE. In it we discuss Ahnold's gender confusion, why prison censors won't pass what they don't understand, and how to distract good people from what's really happening by hitting them where it counts. This is no time to hide under the bed!Saturday, October 20, 2007
Tuesday, October 16, 2007
NIST IMPLICITLY ADMITS WTC TOWERS CONTROLLED DEMO by Kevin Barrett
We respectfully dedicate this post to the individual who so staunchly defended the NIST report at our presentation on September 24.
NIST IMPLICITLY ADMITS: WTC TOWERS DESTROYED IN CONTROLLED DEMOLITION
By Kevin Barrett
http://www.mujca.com
[Note: I will be speaking with Kevin Ryan, a leading expert on the NIST cover-up, at the Peoria Public Library at 2 pm this Saturday, 10/20/07, 107 N.E. Monroe St., Peoria, IL 61602]
Re: http://www.911blogger.com/node/12002
In an amazing about-face, the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) has implicitly admitted that its 10,000-page report on the destruction of the Twin Towers is a fraud, and that the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.
In its recent reply to family members Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, scientists Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage and the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, NIST states: "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."
Thus NIST euphemistically admits that its 10,000-page report on the Towers does not even pretend to provide any explanation whatsoever for the Towers' total collapse--and that indeed no such explanation is possible without invoking the politically-incorrect idea of controlled demolition.
NIST'S 10,000-page report purports to explain what it calls "collapse initiation" -- the loss of several floors' vertical support. In order to dream up this exceedingly unlikely scenario, NIST had to ignore its own tests that showed that virtually none of the steel got hotter than 500 degrees f. It had to claim that somehow the planes took out many core columns, despite the fact that only a direct hit by an engine would have been likely to do so, and that the chances of this happening even once are fairly low. It had to preposterously allege that the plane that nicked the corner of the South Tower took out more core columns than the one that hit the North Tower almost dead center. It had to tweak all the parameters till they screamed bloody murder and say that the steel was far weaker than it actually was, the fire was far hotter than it actually was, the sagging was far greater than it actually was, and so on. And so NIST hallucinated a computer-generated fantasy scenario for "collapse initiation"--the failure of a few floors.
But how do you get from the failure of a few floors to total collapse at free-fall speed of the entire structure? The short answer: You don't. Anyone with the slightest grasp of the laws of physics understands that even if all of the vertical supports on a few floors somehow failed catastrophically at exactly the same time--a virtually impossible event, but one necessary to explain why the Towers would come straight down rather than toppling sideways--the top part of the building could not fall THROUGH the still-intact, highly robust lower part of the building, straight through the path of most resistance, just as fast as it would have fallen through thin air.
Thus total free-fall collapse, even given NIST's ridiculous "initiation" scenario, is utterly impossible. The probability of it happening is exactly equal to the probability of the whole building suddenly falling upward and landing on the moon.
Compare this to a hypothetical case in which forensic evidence proves a victim was shot in the head three times at the foot of a cliff, but the body was found at the top of the cliff. The sheriff, who has the most to gain from the man's death, brings in NIST to explain how the man shot himself in the head three times and then fell upward 200 feet to land on the top of the cliff. NIST produces a 10,000-page report claiming to explain the event. The 10,000-page report ignores all the forensic evidence that the man was murdered, offering endless pages of scientific gobbledygook distorting all the forensic evidence in such a way as to show how a suicide actually could manage to squeeze off three head-shots, and offering a scenario explaining how "upward-fall initiation" took place.
After we read the whole 10,000 pages, it turns out that "upward-fall initiation" simply means that the man lost his footing after being shot. Okay, say Steve Jones, Kevin Ryan and friends, then after he lost his footing, how did he fall upward? NIST responds: "We are unable to provide a full explanation of falling-upward."
It is not surprising that NIST cannot explain a scenario that blatantly violates the basic laws of physics. What is surprising is that every newspaper in the world is not printing screaming front-page headlines reading NIST IMPLICITLY ADMITS: WTC TOWERS DESTROYED IN CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
NIST IMPLICITLY ADMITS: WTC TOWERS DESTROYED IN CONTROLLED DEMOLITION
By Kevin Barrett
http://www.mujca.com
[Note: I will be speaking with Kevin Ryan, a leading expert on the NIST cover-up, at the Peoria Public Library at 2 pm this Saturday, 10/20/07, 107 N.E. Monroe St., Peoria, IL 61602]
Re: http://www.911blogger.com/node/12002
In an amazing about-face, the National Institute for Standards and Technology (NIST) has implicitly admitted that its 10,000-page report on the destruction of the Twin Towers is a fraud, and that the buildings were destroyed by controlled demolition.
In its recent reply to family members Bill Doyle and Bob McIlvaine, scientists Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan, architect Richard Gage and the group Scholars for 9/11 Truth and Justice, NIST states: "We are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."
Thus NIST euphemistically admits that its 10,000-page report on the Towers does not even pretend to provide any explanation whatsoever for the Towers' total collapse--and that indeed no such explanation is possible without invoking the politically-incorrect idea of controlled demolition.
NIST'S 10,000-page report purports to explain what it calls "collapse initiation" -- the loss of several floors' vertical support. In order to dream up this exceedingly unlikely scenario, NIST had to ignore its own tests that showed that virtually none of the steel got hotter than 500 degrees f. It had to claim that somehow the planes took out many core columns, despite the fact that only a direct hit by an engine would have been likely to do so, and that the chances of this happening even once are fairly low. It had to preposterously allege that the plane that nicked the corner of the South Tower took out more core columns than the one that hit the North Tower almost dead center. It had to tweak all the parameters till they screamed bloody murder and say that the steel was far weaker than it actually was, the fire was far hotter than it actually was, the sagging was far greater than it actually was, and so on. And so NIST hallucinated a computer-generated fantasy scenario for "collapse initiation"--the failure of a few floors.
But how do you get from the failure of a few floors to total collapse at free-fall speed of the entire structure? The short answer: You don't. Anyone with the slightest grasp of the laws of physics understands that even if all of the vertical supports on a few floors somehow failed catastrophically at exactly the same time--a virtually impossible event, but one necessary to explain why the Towers would come straight down rather than toppling sideways--the top part of the building could not fall THROUGH the still-intact, highly robust lower part of the building, straight through the path of most resistance, just as fast as it would have fallen through thin air.
Thus total free-fall collapse, even given NIST's ridiculous "initiation" scenario, is utterly impossible. The probability of it happening is exactly equal to the probability of the whole building suddenly falling upward and landing on the moon.
Compare this to a hypothetical case in which forensic evidence proves a victim was shot in the head three times at the foot of a cliff, but the body was found at the top of the cliff. The sheriff, who has the most to gain from the man's death, brings in NIST to explain how the man shot himself in the head three times and then fell upward 200 feet to land on the top of the cliff. NIST produces a 10,000-page report claiming to explain the event. The 10,000-page report ignores all the forensic evidence that the man was murdered, offering endless pages of scientific gobbledygook distorting all the forensic evidence in such a way as to show how a suicide actually could manage to squeeze off three head-shots, and offering a scenario explaining how "upward-fall initiation" took place.
After we read the whole 10,000 pages, it turns out that "upward-fall initiation" simply means that the man lost his footing after being shot. Okay, say Steve Jones, Kevin Ryan and friends, then after he lost his footing, how did he fall upward? NIST responds: "We are unable to provide a full explanation of falling-upward."
It is not surprising that NIST cannot explain a scenario that blatantly violates the basic laws of physics. What is surprising is that every newspaper in the world is not printing screaming front-page headlines reading NIST IMPLICITLY ADMITS: WTC TOWERS DESTROYED IN CONTROLLED DEMOLITION.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

