Thursday, June 28, 2007
Monday, June 18, 2007
Our friend Joe DeRosa, author of THE REALIZATION, appears this week with Vyz on "The Grassy Knoll" to discuss the essay, the experiences and reflections that inspired it, and many other observations occasioned by nearly two decades in prison. This unprecedented interview is available for listening or download HERE.
Joe would enjoy receiving your correspondence (USPS only) at:
Joseph DeRosa 89-C-0182
3622 Wende Road, P.O.Box 1187
Alden, New York 14004-1187
See also our dedicated FREE JOE DEROSA blog.
Sunday, June 17, 2007
Thanks for making me aware of that. Neat video. Probably too neat, by about half? Not exactly positive proof...
I'm unaware of any reasonable hypothesis for why, if the 2nd WTC aerial impact was mere virtual-aircraft video fakery, was there also a flash-frame, just very much muted compared to the first. Why video-fake that (or the apparent partial exit of something)?
I don't rule out [some serious kind/level of] video fakery but, as with thermite, I do not believe that it can account for all the evidence, particularly the flash frames, nor some eyewitnesses who said they saw smaller-than-Boeing aircraft.
As always, we can chase our tails endlessly wondering what 9/11 was, long after we're able to prove that it was not what we were told.
That the video will cause some people to think is good. That it could then prove to be otherwise-explainable would be bad (though the script they were both reading from, in practical harmony, is not easily dismissed by those of us who've given up on being coincidence theorists). But since the dots have already been connected on the use of exotic weaponry at Ground Zero, I think it makes sense to be wary of hypotheses which help keep people from considering the use of exotic/secret weapons systems, the (possible multiple) use of which on 9/11 I am about as certain of as I can be. (For all the recent chatter about "directed energy weapons", AFAIC, IMHO, the best indication there is of their use on 9/11 is the flash frames.)
So I wonder about the fact that video fakery hypotheses tend to do for the anomalous-looking aspects of the WTC impact[s] what Barrie
Zwicker's lies do for Bush's repeated voluntary incriminating 9/11 witness statements -- get them disregarded.
My further reflections:
At this late date, I am loath to jump on any bandwagons. I'm sure Herb feels the same way. And my skin crawls when I look at some of the truly strange bedfellows given a shout-out at the end of that video. This video fakery crew, whatever the merits of their arguments, have that "either you're with us or against us" mentality that (in this case) makes for a pocket-sized mini-dialectic. And some, like Nico, take an infantile delight in playing with feces.
In the scheme of things, "video fakery" is moot. It might have been all part of the high-tech magic show, but it's not integral to the way the buildings were destroyed. It's a distraction, proving only that (surprise, surprise!) the Media are rotten. It's also true that many of the people saying the Media are rotten are themselves rotten.
There are additional comments forthcoming, and there are more comprehensive "video fakery" videos I may post soon. Watch this space.
Note how, at 2:22 from the end of Part 2, the "missile" seems to grow a tail and a right wing as it hits the building! Who's faking here?
Tuesday, June 12, 2007
Monday, June 11, 2007
They're all scum. Every single damn politician is filthy dirty. Right, left, or what-have-you. And don't tell me Ron Paul is going to save us. He's already speaking out of both sides of his mouth with regard to the events of 9/11/01. (To be fair, any politician who doesn't have at least two faces is not equipped for the job.)
The only way to save America is to turn the power pyramid on its head and decentralize everything to the hilt. But that's not about to happen, of course.
It's a train wreck, people. Who brought the popcorn?
Wednesday, June 06, 2007
Tuesday, June 05, 2007
Scroll way down to read what the head of the Republican Party in Ark. has to say about how to drum up support for Bush. Here's the quote:
He said he's "150 percent" behind Bush on the war in Iraq.
"At the end of the day, I believe fully the president is doing the right thing, and I think all we need is some attacks on American soil like we had on [Sept. 11, 2001], and the naysayers will come around very quickly to appreciate not only the commitment for President Bush, but the sacrifice that has been made by men and women to protect this country," Milligan said.
Somewhere, Orwell is smiling.