Monday, July 31, 2006

Minority Report

Victor Thorn of WING-TV doesn't think the LA Scholars program on C-SPAN was such a big deal. Though I respectfully disagree, HERE is his take on the issue.

Sunday, July 30, 2006


CARL PERSON is running for New York Attorney General on a 9/11 Truth platform. (The AG is the ONE who can bring the perpetrators of the 9/11 atrocity to justice.) Download his nominating petition here.

Time is of the essence--he needs the petitions within three weeks.

Thursday, July 27, 2006

My Letter to the Durango Herald


A friend of mine forwarded your recent online poll on 9/11, which I noted had a preponderance of the respondents stating that 9/11 was a cover-up. (The results were 63.99% for as opposed to 36.01% against, with 3749 responding.)

Now I note that these poll results have disappeared from your website. Considering that this was one of your most popular polls, I think that might bother those who contributed. Some of them with might even suspect that you had censored the results--basing that suspicion on the shoddy treatment of the 9/11 truth movement by the media generally.

I'd be interested in knowing why the poll results disappeared. If 64% of your respondents feel that 9/11 was at the very least a cover-up, I'd say that's big news.

Andy Senior

Wednesday, July 26, 2006

The Case of the Disappearing Poll

Within the past day the Durango Herald has removed the results of a poll stating that 64% of 3749 respondents believe that 9/11 was a cover-up. Larry of Utica forwarded the link, and I was going to post the results (it was already too late to vote on the issue) but I procrastinated. The results must have surprised/troubled/embarrassed/offended somebody.

Write to the Durango Herald and tell them what you think of censorship.

Monday, July 24, 2006

The Battle Has Been Joined

Utica rears its ugly head in today's O-D. (Did we honestly think this was going to be easy?)

World Trade Center conspiracy theory bunk

I see the conspiracy theorists are at it again (July 17 letter regarding Building 7). Everything is a conspiracy since the Kennedy assassination (Oliver Stone's movie, before someone brings it up, is historically inaccurate and fiction).

Now, we are to believe the government took down the World Trade Center buildings with explosives, just because it looked like a controlled demolition. I have seen a TV special with architects explaining why the buildings collapsed as they did. Once one floor gave way, it was a "pancaking" effect; nothing conspiratorial about it (other than the hijackers).

We are also to believe the government can keep these grand conspiracies quiet, even though a White House sexual encounter could not be. I will be told I am naive, and not rationally looking at it. I am supposed to believe some Web site full of suppositions and unchecked facts. What rot! It is the gullible, naive and paranoid who believe such baloney.



(Actually "naive" isn't the first epithet that I would cast at this writer. How about "cognitively constipated, television-hynotized tool?")

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

Proving the Impossibilty of the Pancake Collapse

With a few basic laws of physics we can show that the official account of a fire-induced, gravitational collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11 is physically impossible.

The Towers came down in roughly 13 - 16 seconds. Freefall in a vacuum from the height their height is 9.2 seconds. (Galileo's Law of Falling Bodies) Calculations show that if the floors had magically hovered in the air with no supporting structure and provided no resistance to the floors above it would take a minumum of 15.5 seconds for 110 floors to reach the ground. (Law of Momentum Conservation)

So we have a free-fall collapse (had the floors been pancaking) indicating no resistance, yet we have the simultaneous ejection of heavy steel beams hundreds of feet and the pulverization and mushrooming of concrete and non-metallic material, indicating massive resistance. We have an impossible conflict.

An elementary energy analysis reveals a similar conflict. According to the official theory the only energy available to destroy the Towers (kinetic) was their potential gravitational energy. (Law of Energy Conservation) However the free-fall speed of the Towers means all of gravity's energy was used in bringing down the buildings leaving no energy left to pulverize the concrete, slice and eject the huge steel beams and produce to huge dust clouds that expanded to 5 times the volume of the buildings.

So what could account for the removal of resistance and the energy required to destroy the buildings? Explosives. One additional note - since the Towers were exploded from the top down, the rate of the collapse would be determined by the timing of the explosives.

Tuesday, July 18, 2006

Robert Bowman on The Mike Malloy Program last Friday!

Have I mentioned lately how much I appreciate Mike Malloy?

Here is a link to his interview with Lt. Col. Robert Bowman last Friday, July 14 (stream or download). Listen to his program each weeknight 10PM-1AM ET on Air America and check out his archived broadcast at the White Rose Society.

And who would we have to bribe to get his great show on the Big Talker here in Utica?

Monday, July 17, 2006

Saturday, July 15, 2006

Cheney's "Welcoming Committee" in Utica, NY

Here are photos of the demonstration that took place in Utica, New York yesterday in anticipation of Dick Cheney's arrival at the Hotel Utica next door. The man wearing the black hood and orange jumpsuit is Herb of Uticans for 9/11 truth:

Sunday, July 02, 2006

Oklahoma City Bombing: Clear Evidence of Cover-Up

They were just practicing for 9/11/2001.

Saturday, July 01, 2006