AN OPEN LETTER TO WING-TV

Yesterday, WING TV produced a program on removing the "cancer" from the 9/11 Truth effort, with special reference to the appearance of John Kaminski on Jim Fetzer's radio show (guest hosted by Kevin Barrett) on October 14. I heard the original broadcast, and voiced my opinion on the Barrett interview, the tone taken in WING's response, and the increasing tendency of WING-TV to play "Pin the Blame on the Hebrew." Both Victor and Lisa responded with alacrity, and at length, to my letter, and Victor posted his reply to my letter as a WING article, The Cancer: A Response.

I had not intended posting my original letter to WING, but do so here only to have my view represented fully, and in context. What I have here stated does not represent a consensus between me and any other member of this forum, but is my own opinion entirely:

Dear Victor and Lisa,

I have great respect for your work in bringing about the acceptance of the controlled demolition of the WTC buildings as the standard explanation, as well as for your efforts in exposing what really occurred in Shanksville, PA. I've long admired your fierce sincerity in fighting the controlled media and the left gatekeepers to get the word out that 9/11 was indeed a self-inflicted wound.

I've felt lately though that WING-TV has come too much under the sway of mean little bigots like John Kaminski. I heard the Kevin Barrett interview, and I'm afraid I share his distaste for wholesale slander of an entire ethnic/religious group. Kaminski was polite and didn't shout, but I found his statements sick-making. (They reminded me of a CD I have of Nazi propaganda recordings featuring twisted parodies of American popular songs. I can't listen to more than a few tracks at a time. The recordings are palpably evil.)

Kevin Barrett said that he wished that Israel had never been established. That should be enough to satisfy any questions about his opinions on Zionism. He ended the interview not because he's some sort of Zionist tool or Crypto-Jew, but because he is a sensitive person and felt genuine revulsion at hearing such talk. He is intelligent enough to see that Kaminski's Hegelian Dialectic (you're either with us or with the Jews) is invalid.

Nor is it evidence of a Globalist agenda to reject jingoistic nationalism. (There's Mr. Hegel!) Just because we have an understanding that, as human beings, we're all in this together doesn't mean we hanker for a New World Order. Quite the reverse.

I'd have to say your "cancer" metaphor was clumsy, inaccurate, and somewhat offensive. My mother died of multiple cancers on November 18, 2004 after struggling for five years to live. It wasn't a "Jewish" cancer. I can't equate a human being, no matter how nasty, with that disease. (And I certainly wouldn't characterize a whole race of people as such.) All human beings are theoretically capable of redeeming themselves or of finding redemption through grace. (I'm not religious, but I won't dismiss it out of hand.) To suggest that certain people can't be redeemed leads to the assertion that they should be "cut out." Now we're back to Hitler again.

The true Globalist agenda is this: the elites of all nations are basically buddies--Jew, Arab, Christian, Communist, Capitalist, what have you. All conflicts are essentially intramural--they set us as each other's throats not merely for the sick entertainment value it affords them, but because when things get really dicey they'll feel justified in stepping in to impose their One World dictatorship. Anyone who engages in such jingoistic, ethnic, religious, or racial roughhousing is playing into their hands. (Watch H.G.Wells' "Things to Come" and you'll get a sense of it--there's a rough blueprint, courtesy of the Fabian Socialists.)

If there is a "cancer" to be extirpated from our world at large, it isn't any one race of people but the irrational hatred of the Other that drives us ever closer to slavery and ruin. Bigots like Kaminski are carriers of this malignant virus. Fortunately, there's a cure--just stop hating.

You'll disagree with what I've said, and perhaps even sneer at it. So be it. I felt it had to be stated. I wish you peace.

Andy Senior