Dunne veers into 9/11 debunkery HERE. What--no Controlled Demolition? No "near free-fall collapse?" No long-lasting subterranean pools of molten steel? In Dunne's view, issues about structural integrity trump physics.
It's worth listening to both segments (Part 1 and Part 2), if only to elevate one's blood pressure. Herb and I will respond to this material shortly.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
33 comments:
Only a narcissist would label his mp3s as 'BeautifulTruth' (and I haven't even started listening yet...)
I listened to both segments and am frankly astonished by his 'reasoning'. He's invented a new law of physics: namely that collapsing buildings generate enough heat to melt steel ! -
that's at the start of the second segment.
In addition he completely ignores the accounts of explosions in the basement as well as throughout the towers long before they collapsed - in the case of the explosions in the sub-levels William Rodriguez and others there at the time state that there were explosions there even before the first plane struck the tower. Has Fintan sold out? It sure looks like it.
Dunne has certainly jumped the shark here. Perhaps this is to smoke out the fakes on his board but I seriously doubt it.
Andy and I are going through the audio and hope to do a show or two about it.
Thanks for the comments.
Fintan must be cleaning the books.
He can't possibly believe what he's saying.
Clearing dead wood is my hunch.
Eat lots of garlic while listening to these podcasts. It naturally lowers one's blood pressure.
I hear what you're saying Mike D. Andy and I are preparing for shows with Vyz and Gordon and although we'll have to assume he's serious, we'll bring up the possibility that this is a ruse.
If this is a ruse he will have to 'fess up to it very soon.
What does he have to gain from this?: - flushing out the fakes on his forum?
Clearly doing such a thing is no way to garner credibility and in fact takes away from his credibility which strongly argues against this being a ruse.
Dunne did do something like that before with his CIA fakes list. According to him, he knowingly had fakes on his show and appeared on theirs to do his "research."
Also had Ron Paul on his show even though he said Paul's candidacy was just to sucker the angry conservatives.
Just holding out the possibility in case he does an about face. Listening to part two of his audio, however, I doubt it.
And his cred is pretty much shot after this.
No surprise here, thats why I stopped listening to him years ago.
Robert
Amazing the childish peeveishness and jealousy of finton the done.
Amazing the childish peeveishness and jealousy of finton the done.
Post a Comment