Thanks but I think I could have done better. I wanted to make it mainly about the energy expended but next time I'll address the structural damage from the plane impacts and NIST's input data. Think I'll also include more on how gravity acts.
Talking in any way about "the plane impacts" gives/reinforces the mistaken impression that "the planes" [sic] (are what) hit the towers.
Referring to the fictitious elements of The Big Lie as if they were real (even while attacking TBL) is why The Big Lie has such an impressive record of success down through the ages (because it's easy to get ensnared in the tentacles of a huge lie, and when those who tell the lies and those who attack the lies seem to agree on certain lies, why would any undecideds ever question those particular lies?)...
I wanted to keep it at just the gravitational energy and the features of a collapse due to explosives but some isiots still get hung up on the structural damage due to the plane impacts.
I agree that the alleged flights did not hit the Towers but sometimes it's necessary to show them that even if it were true, it still wouldn't account for what happened.
4 comments:
Herb did a great job. The boycotting bedwetters can pound sand
Thanks but I think I could have done better. I wanted to make it mainly about the energy expended but next time I'll address the structural damage from the plane impacts and NIST's input data. Think I'll also include more on how gravity acts.
The 'plane' impacts???
Talking in any way about "the plane impacts" gives/reinforces the mistaken impression that "the planes" [sic] (are what) hit the towers.
Referring to the fictitious elements of The Big Lie as if they were real (even while attacking TBL) is why The Big Lie has such an impressive record of success down through the ages (because it's easy to get ensnared in the tentacles of a huge lie, and when those who tell the lies and those who attack the lies seem to agree on certain lies, why would any undecideds ever question those particular lies?)...
I wanted to keep it at just the gravitational energy and the features of a collapse due to explosives but some isiots still get hung up on the structural damage due to the plane impacts.
I agree that the alleged flights did not hit the Towers but sometimes it's necessary to show them that even if it were true, it still wouldn't account for what happened.
Post a Comment