I recently borrowed a copy of Jay Weidner's "Kubrick's Odyssey Secrets Hidden in the films of Stanley Kubrick." Part One concerns the Apollo moon landings. Weidner makes an excellent case showing the same technology used in "2001: A Space Odyssey" is the same technology used in the faking of the landings. Further, Kubrick appears to have confessed via clues put in "The Shining."
It's really worth the watch. Note that Weidner takes a somewhat safe approach stating he believes the filming was faked so the Russians wouldn't be able to see America's technology. Obviously I think he's wrong and that reasoning doesn't fly 45 years later but I'll give him a pass considering his discovery.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
8 comments:
Widener makes me want to vomit profusely. What I'd like to know once and for all is: Can humans pass through the Van Allen Belt? is the Van Allen Belt all encompassing about the Earth?
Sure it's strange that the US or any other nation just dumped the moon thing.
Now with the Mars thing, still no talk about manned flights, right?
Where they gonna shoot that? Red Rocks Colorado?
Vyz
Hey guys what about that latest comet landing of that European Space Agency rover!!!!!
Are you freaking kidding me? I'm supposed to believe that a rover was able to hit a rock about three miles wide over 40 million miles away moving at 50,000 miles per hour. Come on.
Vyz interviewed Dave Mcgowan on the moon landing fraud many years ago. McGowan is the authority on the landing fraud as far as I'm concerned.
Have you guys ever listened to Gary "Spaceman" Bell on the radio show a 'View From Space' on Toronto 640AM ?
He's a lot like Vyz; give him an ear sometime.
I don't remember ever interviewing McGowan about the moon landing.
And I'm not at all like Bell.
--Vyz
Vyz-
I'm sorry and stand corrected. Your interview with McGowan was on his book about serial killers if I'm not mistaken? Sorry about that.
My comparison with Vyzygoth and the Spaceman was simply in that they both relate some very obscure material and not meant to compare the two in any form of equivalence.
What about the comet, any comment on that?
PS.
I'm talking about Gary Bell, NOT ART BELL for clarification.
Gary runs the show A View From Space not the show Coast to Coast.
http://www.clavius.org/envrad.html
This article maintains that the astronauts can pass through the VAB'S and not incur serious damage. The article does not go into all aspects of the moon landings being faked, just this particular aspect. That being said, it is interesting to note Moon exploration was "dumped".
Entertain this for a second, say that man did go to the moon. Unannounced, international trip. They find there are huge deposits of metals,minerals, say water and oil for fucks sake too. (It is a rock after all)How would that effect those markets here on Earth? Maybe there was an agreement to leave things alone for the time being.
A while back, a friend at work was talking about HAARP and had asked me if I knew anything about it. My total knowledge on it is about 2 sentences. I did that day, as a lark, go home and typed in "weather weapons". I got about 7-8 docs, mostly UN treaties/agreements to not pursue/use weather weapons. Are there any such agreements concerning moon exploration?
Oh. 1 more thing, some comic releif......
https://diehipster.wordpress.com I like Arty the Seals entries.
McGowan did great work on the moon landing hoax. Gordon Comstock interviewed Dave about it but I don't know if it's around anymore.
As far as the comet, I don't believe anything that comes from any space agency.
NASA = Never A Straight Answer.
Post a Comment